Comments on: CSS 3: Progress! (Updated) http://infrequently.org/2009/08/css-3-progress/ Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:30:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: CSS3: Flexible Box Layout Module - TomStardust.com http://infrequently.org/2009/08/css-3-progress/comment-page-1/#comment-236588 CSS3: Flexible Box Layout Module - TomStardust.com Thu, 15 Oct 2009 04:31:32 +0000 http://alex.dojotoolkit.org/?p=1060#comment-236588 [...] altro articolo interessante a riguardo è sul blog di Alex Russel, che ha preparato un foglio di stile su misura per avere già pronte tutte le classi [...] [...] altro articolo interessante a riguardo è sul blog di Alex Russel, che ha preparato un foglio di stile su misura per avere già pronte tutte le classi [...]

]]> By: Axel Rauschmayer http://infrequently.org/2009/08/css-3-progress/comment-page-1/#comment-236585 Axel Rauschmayer Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:48:22 +0000 http://alex.dojotoolkit.org/?p=1060#comment-236585 I prefer template layout to flexible box layout, it's more intuitive. I've blogged about it a while ago [1]. Some kind of solution is sorely needed, layout is *the* major pain point of Ajax right now. [1] http://2ality.blogspot.com/2009/07/css-layout-soon-good-enough-for-guis.html I prefer template layout to flexible box layout, it’s more intuitive. I’ve blogged about it a while ago [1].

Some kind of solution is sorely needed, layout is *the* major pain point of Ajax right now.

[1] http://2ality.blogspot.com/2009/07/css-layout-soon-good-enough-for-guis.html

]]> By: Introducing the Flexible Box Layout module | Mark Best http://infrequently.org/2009/08/css-3-progress/comment-page-1/#comment-236556 Introducing the Flexible Box Layout module | Mark Best Fri, 09 Oct 2009 00:48:43 +0000 http://alex.dojotoolkit.org/?p=1060#comment-236556 [...] owe a huge debt of thanks to Alex Russell’s article, CSS3: Progress!, which explained the syntax clearly to [...] [...] owe a huge debt of thanks to Alex Russell’s article, CSS3: Progress!, which explained the syntax clearly to [...]

]]> By: Introducing the Flexible Box Layout module | Mark Best http://infrequently.org/2009/08/css-3-progress/comment-page-1/#comment-236558 Introducing the Flexible Box Layout module | Mark Best Fri, 09 Oct 2009 00:48:43 +0000 http://alex.dojotoolkit.org/?p=1060#comment-236558 [...] owe a huge debt of thanks to Alex Russell’s article, CSS3: Progress!, which explained the syntax clearly to [...] [...] owe a huge debt of thanks to Alex Russell’s article, CSS3: Progress!, which explained the syntax clearly to [...]

]]> By: Introducing the Flexible Box Layout module | Mark Best http://infrequently.org/2009/08/css-3-progress/comment-page-1/#comment-236557 Introducing the Flexible Box Layout module | Mark Best Fri, 09 Oct 2009 00:48:43 +0000 http://alex.dojotoolkit.org/?p=1060#comment-236557 [...] owe a huge debt of thanks to Alex Russell’s article, CSS3: Progress!, which explained the syntax clearly to [...] [...] owe a huge debt of thanks to Alex Russell’s article, CSS3: Progress!, which explained the syntax clearly to [...]

]]> By: Introducing the Flexible Box Layout module - CSS3 . Info http://infrequently.org/2009/08/css-3-progress/comment-page-1/#comment-236552 Introducing the Flexible Box Layout module - CSS3 . Info Wed, 07 Oct 2009 22:55:32 +0000 http://alex.dojotoolkit.org/?p=1060#comment-236552 [...] swiftly to become a recommendation.I owe a huge debt of thanks to Alex Russell’s article, CSS3: Progress!, which explained the syntax clearly to me.Read more articles like this on my blog, Broken [...] [...] swiftly to become a recommendation.I owe a huge debt of thanks to Alex Russell’s article, CSS3: Progress!, which explained the syntax clearly to me.Read more articles like this on my blog, Broken [...]

]]> By: Marcos Aruj http://infrequently.org/2009/08/css-3-progress/comment-page-1/#comment-236520 Marcos Aruj Fri, 25 Sep 2009 20:15:43 +0000 http://alex.dojotoolkit.org/?p=1060#comment-236520 Hi, Thanks for this article. I was just trying this on a chrome extension and wasn't able to nest boxes and flex some of them. The problem was that display:block for box children was overiding display: -webkit-box. I added !important to the latter and now it works. Hope this helps ;) Marcos Hi,

Thanks for this article. I was just trying this on a chrome extension and wasn’t able to nest boxes and flex some of them. The problem was that display:block for box children was overiding display: -webkit-box. I added !important to the latter and now it works.

Hope this helps ;)

Marcos

]]> By: » CSS layout z flexibilních boxů - Martin Hassman: blog nejen o prohlížečích http://infrequently.org/2009/08/css-3-progress/comment-page-1/#comment-236372 » CSS layout z flexibilních boxů - Martin Hassman: blog nejen o prohlížečích Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:05:01 +0000 http://alex.dojotoolkit.org/?p=1060#comment-236372 [...] Více viz CSS 3: Progress! od Alexa Russella. [...] [...] Více viz CSS 3: Progress! od Alexa Russella. [...]

]]> By: David Reese http://infrequently.org/2009/08/css-3-progress/comment-page-1/#comment-236359 David Reese Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:49:23 +0000 http://alex.dojotoolkit.org/?p=1060#comment-236359 "nicer form layouts" As Benjamin H-L hints, this makes me nervous about what this form "looks like" without the CSS -- for example, in a screen reader. Some of us remember how with css-based layouts we could finally have control over source order; this form is a step backward in that department. Maybe an out-of-order form isn't the best example for using vboxes? “nicer form layouts”

As Benjamin H-L hints, this makes me nervous about what this form “looks like” without the CSS — for example, in a screen reader. Some of us remember how with css-based layouts we could finally have control over source order; this form is a step backward in that department.

Maybe an out-of-order form isn’t the best example for using vboxes?

]]> By: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewi http://infrequently.org/2009/08/css-3-progress/comment-page-1/#comment-236349 Benjamin Hawkes-Lewi Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:27:30 +0000 http://alex.dojotoolkit.org/?p=1060#comment-236349 "nicer form layouts" Hmm. Hopefully, it can it be used to do this without the result being jumbled when publisher CSS isn't applied… “nicer form layouts”

Hmm. Hopefully, it can it be used to do this without the result being jumbled when publisher CSS isn’t applied…

]]> By: Billy http://infrequently.org/2009/08/css-3-progress/comment-page-1/#comment-236339 Billy Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:29:05 +0000 http://alex.dojotoolkit.org/?p=1060#comment-236339 @Bilgehan: Tables are only intuitive if that's what you learned first. For those of us that started with CSS layouts, table layouts are mind boggling. Anyway, this is the first I've heard about flexboxes and I'm excited to see it added to CSS3. @Bilgehan: Tables are only intuitive if that’s what you learned first. For those of us that started with CSS layouts, table layouts are mind boggling.

Anyway, this is the first I’ve heard about flexboxes and I’m excited to see it added to CSS3.

]]> By: Ajaxian » CSS 3 Flexible Box Model http://infrequently.org/2009/08/css-3-progress/comment-page-1/#comment-236333 Ajaxian » CSS 3 Flexible Box Model Sun, 23 Aug 2009 11:24:12 +0000 http://alex.dojotoolkit.org/?p=1060#comment-236333 [...] latest post shows this as he talked about CSS 3 progress and specifically the flexible box model that Mozilla and WebKit have had forevaaaaaah: David Baron [...] [...] latest post shows this as he talked about CSS 3 progress and specifically the flexible box model that Mozilla and WebKit have had forevaaaaaah: David Baron [...]

]]> By: Bilgehan http://infrequently.org/2009/08/css-3-progress/comment-page-1/#comment-236332 Bilgehan Sun, 23 Aug 2009 09:14:25 +0000 http://alex.dojotoolkit.org/?p=1060#comment-236332 CSS animations and transformations are nice but i think easy and proper positioning without using hacks should be first priority for CSS3 spec. The reason most people still use tables is that it is so intuitive. CSS animations and transformations are nice but i think easy and proper positioning without using hacks should be first priority for CSS3 spec. The reason most people still use tables is that it is so intuitive.

]]> By: alex http://infrequently.org/2009/08/css-3-progress/comment-page-1/#comment-236326 alex Sun, 23 Aug 2009 01:10:53 +0000 http://alex.dojotoolkit.org/?p=1060#comment-236326 Mart: "CSS is not supposed to be used for that" is what has kept CSS from crawling out of the primordial pit for nearly a decade. It's really too bad that our expectations have been lowered so far. That said, if there's some *other* part of the web stack that you think should take this one natively (and no, JavaScript doesn't count), then I guess I'm all ears. Regards Mart:

“CSS is not supposed to be used for that” is what has kept CSS from crawling out of the primordial pit for nearly a decade. It’s really too bad that our expectations have been lowered so far.

That said, if there’s some *other* part of the web stack that you think should take this one natively (and no, JavaScript doesn’t count), then I guess I’m all ears.

Regards

]]> By: Mart http://infrequently.org/2009/08/css-3-progress/comment-page-1/#comment-236325 Mart Sun, 23 Aug 2009 01:02:23 +0000 http://alex.dojotoolkit.org/?p=1060#comment-236325 I dont see why people get excited with css animations, CSS is not supposed to be used for that I dont see why people get excited with css animations, CSS is not supposed to be used for that

]]>